My new source is a source that I found on the Library's EBSCO search. The article is entitled "In the clinic, Lyme Disease." This article is a great source because it is very detailed and has a lot of in depth information. The article has many different parts, each of these going over an issue that I will be including in my paper. It is written by a Linden T. Hu. Hu is a Physician at Tufts Medical Center for Infectious Diseases. Due to the fact that he works with patients who are diagnosed with Infectious Diseases, I believe the article that he wrote is extremely credible. When I was tested for multiple diseases, the doctors recommended me to go to an infectious disease center. They are very knowledgeable in the topics of Lyme Disease and other tick borne illnesses. So knowing that he wrote this, I would trust the information to be credible. I am very impressed with this article and the amount of information involved in it.
Essentially this article covers the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and other topics. Each of these topics include a good amount of information to help the reader understand it.
http://ehis.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=b89a2116-9917-4934-b55a-d35290010c7a%40sessionmgr115&vid=4&hid=117
Dani, I'm glad one of the library's databases was useful for finding your next source. Your CRAAP analysis has improved since your last post but you still have some room for growth. Your analysis mostly assesses the credibility of the author, but remember that the CRAAP test has five separate components that added together paint a complete credibility picture.
ReplyDeleteYour basic summary needs more detail to help you audience understand exactly what to expect from the article. What topics fall under "and other topics"? What is the overall purpose of the article? What's the one main idea a reader would walk away with?
I'm looking forward to seeing your progress with your next post!